#1
![Image](http://www.gophotog.org/allphotos/lenstesting/medium_photos/D7F_4991.jpg)
#2
![Image](http://www.gophotog.org/allphotos/lenstesting/medium_photos/D7F_4989.jpg)
#3
![Image](http://www.gophotog.org/allphotos/lenstesting/medium_photos/D7F_4979.jpg)
#4
![Image](http://www.gophotog.org/allphotos/lenstesting/medium_photos/D7F_4981.jpg)
I decided I did not need the extra weight and expense of the f2.8 version. I do very little photography that requires the f2.8. The f4 that I bought is supposed to be just as sharp, and can be hand held. The tripod collar is optional.....Sparkey wrote:I have an f2.8 70-200 and love it for its sharpness and pnly wish I could get to use it more often.
jon.oman wrote:I decided I did not need the extra weight and expense of the f2.8 version. I do very little photography that requires the f2.8. The f4 that I bought is supposed to be just as sharp, and can be hand held. The tripod collar is optional.....Sparkey wrote:I have an f2.8 70-200 and love it for its sharpness and pnly wish I could get to use it more often.
I don't do any of that....Sparkey wrote:jon.oman wrote:I decided I did not need the extra weight and expense of the f2.8 version. I do very little photography that requires the f2.8. The f4 that I bought is supposed to be just as sharp, and can be hand held. The tripod collar is optional.....Sparkey wrote:I have an f2.8 70-200 and love it for its sharpness and pnly wish I could get to use it more often.
Really only for Sports shooting.